If Forstchen is Right, Why is the US Navy Provoking China?

Jan. 28, 2019
by Bob Adelmann

When William Forstchen’s novel One Second After was published in April 2011, it was cited on the floor of Congress as a book that Americans should read. Enough of them did that it made it onto the New York Times’ bestseller list that year.

This was not your typical apocalyptic, End-of-Western-Civilization-As-We-Know-It novel. First, the author knew what he was talking and writing about. He holds a Ph.D. in history from Purdue with specializations in military history, the Civil War, and the history of technology. 

Second, he provided endnotes that backed up his thesis that formed the basis for his novel. He quoted from the 2004 report issued by the “Congressional Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack”:

The high-altitude nuclear weapon-generated electromagnetic pulse (EMP) is one of a small number of threats that has the potential to hold our society seriously at risk and might result in defeat of our military forces….

The electromagnetic fields produced by weapons designed and deployed with the intent to produce EMP have a high likelihood of damaging electrical power systems, electronics, and information systems upon which American society depends. Their effects on dependent systems and infrastructures could be sufficient to qualify as catastrophic to the Nation.

If Fortschen is right, then what on earth is the U.S. Navy doing provoking China by sending warships into the Taiwan Strait last week? It sounded like a deliberate provocation if one listens to spokesman Lt. Commander Tim Gorman, who said it was strictly “routine” but added ominously that the maneuver “demonstrates the US commitment to a free and open Indo-Pacific … [and] the Navy will continue to fly, sail, and operate anywhere international law allows.”

China has disagreed with that assessment for years, claiming that it has sovereignty over the island and that Taiwan’s status as a separate Republic of China isn’t legitimate. Accordingly, China sent several military jets near the southern tip of the island late Thursday to make the point.

When the Navy sent two “surface combatants” through the Strait in October, and then again in November, China responded by sending multiple warships of its own into the area.

As far back as 1996, the communist Chinese government knew that the U.S. was vulnerable to a nuclear Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) set off in the atmosphere above the country. According to an article published by the Peoples’ Liberation Army (PLA) – China’s military arm – it exposed that vulnerability:

Some people might think that things similar to the “Pearl Harbor Incident” are unlikely to take place during the information age. Yet it could be regarded as the “Pearl Harbor Incident” of the 21st century if a surprise attack is conducted against the enemy’s [the United States] crucial information systems of command, control, and communications by such means as electronic warfare, electromagnetic pulse weapons, telecommunications interference and suppression, computer viruses, and if the enemy is deprived of the information it needs as a result.

Even a super military power like the United States, which possesses nuclear missiles and powerful armed forces, cannot guarantee its immunity….

In their own words, a highly computerized open society like the United States is extremely vulnerable to electronic attacks from all sides. This is because the U.S. economy, from banks to telephone systems and from power plants to iron and steel works, relies entirely on computer networks….

When a country grows increasingly powerful economically and technologically … it will become increasingly dependent on modern information systems….

The United States is more vulnerable to attacks than any other country in the world….”

Dr. Peter Vincent Pry, a former staff member of the House Armed Services Committee, reminded his readers in July 2017 that Russia was also aware of that vulnerability:

Russia made a thinly veiled EMP threat against the United States on May 2, 1999, in an apparent effort to blackmail the U.S. to stop the Balkans War.

During the spring of 1999, tensions between the United States and Russia rose sharply over Operation ALLIED FORCE, the North American Treaty Organization (NATO) bombing campaign against Yugoslavia. A bipartisan delegation from the House Armed Services Committee of the U.S. Congress met in Vienna with their Russian counterparts on the Duma International Affairs Committee, headed by Chairman Vladimir Lukin. The object of the meeting was to reduce U.S.-Russia tensions and seek Russian help in resolving the Balkans War.

On May 2, during the Vienna meeting, Chairman Lukin and Deputy Chairman Alexander Shabanov chastised the United States for military aggression in the Balkans, and warned that Russia was not helpless to oppose Operation ALLIED FORCE. [Said Lukin]: “Hypothetically, if Russia really wanted to hurt the United States in retaliation for NATO’s bombing of Yugoslavia, Russia could fire a submarine launched ballistic missile and detonate a single nuclear warhead at high altitude over the United States. The resulting electromagnetic pulse would massively disrupt U.S. communications and computer systems, shutting down everything. No internet. Nothing.”

[Added Shabanov]: “And if that didn’t work, we’d just launch another missile.”


Threats from other nations are serious. The U.S. also faces serious threats from within. One of the main forces trying to disarm and subjugate the U.S. is a billionaire with a totalitarian bent. He has motive, means, and opportunity, and his fingerprints are all over many of the weapons of destruction being used against the republic. Read more about him and his crusade to destroy this country in this FREE report.


Apparently frightened by the potential threat, Congress did what it usually does in the face of a crisis: it created a committee to study the matter and come up with recommendations. They called it “The Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from Electromagnetic Pulse (EMP) Attack,” and tasked it in 2001 to assess the following:

1. The nature and magnitude of potential high-altitude threats to the United States…;

2. The vulnerability of the United States military and … civilian systems to an EMP attack;

3. The capability … to repair and recover from … an EMP attack; and

4. The feasibility and cost of hardening [those] systems against an EMP attack.

The committee studied the threat and made more than a hundred recommendations to Congress, which it ignored. Soon thereafter the committee was shut down.

The committee was resurrected in 2015 and its results freshened. It issued a series of reports, the last one in July 2017. That last one didn’t see the light of day until last Thursday, January 24. Bill Gertz, national security reporter, editor and columnist for the Washington Times for 27 years before moving to the Washington Free Beacon, reviewed it and learned that those threats are real: China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran are already building such weapons. It’s been part of their military strategies for years:

“Nuclear EMP attack is part of the military doctrines, plans, and exercises of Russia, China, North Korea, and Iran for a revolutionary new way of warfare against military forces and civilian critical infrastructures by cyber, sabotage, and EMP,” the report states.

This new way of warfare is called many things by many nations: In Russia, China, and Iran it is called Sixth Generation Warfare, Non-Contact Warfare, Electronic Warfare, Total Information Warfare, and Cyber Warfare.

Nuclear-electronic warfare also is called “Blackout War” because of its effects on all electronic devices.

The report warned that millions of U.S. citizens could die if any of these countries did launch a nuclear weapon to create an EMP:

Potential adversaries [i.e., the United States] should understand that millions could die from the long-term collateral effects of EMP and cyber-attacks that cause protracted blackout of national electric grids and other life-sustaining critical infrastructures….

A single nuclear weapon can potentially make an EMP attack against a target the size of North America. Any nuclear weapon detonated at an altitude of 30 kilometers [18.6 miles] or higher will generate a potentially catastrophic EMP….

A super-EMP warhead, in the possession of Russia or North Korea, could put at risk the best protected U.S. assets, even threatening the survival of the U.S. nuclear deterrent.

If Fortschen is right (he wrote a follow-up novel in 2016, One Year After, built around the same thesis) and if China (along with Russia, Iran and other state and non-state actors, i.e. Islamic terrorists) has the capability to respond with a nuclear EMP, why would the U.S. Navy deliberately provoke a response that could not only end badly for the United States but potentially send it back to the 18th century?

---------------------------

Sources:

Amazon: One Second After (A John Matherson Novel) 2011

Background on Fortschen

Amazon: One Year After – A John Matherson Novel 2016

South China Morning Post: US warships sail through the closely watched Taiwan Strait, turning up the pressure on Beijing

FreeBeacon.com: China, Russia Building Super-EMP Bombs for ‘Blackout Warfare’

Commission to Assess the Threat to the United States from electromagnetic pulse (EMP) Attack

The April 2008 report from the commission

HighFrontier.org: April 2017 letter to Rick Perry, Secretary of Energy from the commission

TheHill.com: Ignoring EMP threat is a death sentence for Americans

WashingtonExaminer.com: EMP Commission warns ‘blackout’ of electricity, food, water to last ‘year or longer,’ huge death toll

13th and final report issued by the commission in July 2017 (just declassified)

Background on the EMP

Add new comment

Plain text

CHECK OUT THE ENTIRE MCALVANY NETWORK

McAlvany Weekly Commentary provides investors with valuable monetary, economic, geo-political and financial information that cannot be found on Wall Street. Your host David McAlvany presents a solid strategy of wealth preservation for your financial and retirement assets while living in an unstable economy.

Through its client focused, customized approach, MWM is committed to providing independent, well-researched, objective advice, and investment professionalism. At MWM, our client commitment is to preserve capital, manage risk, and grow your assets in an ever-changing global environment.

At International Collectors Associates (ICA), we specialize in the sale of bullion, semi-rare U.S. and European gold coins and secure offshore storage in Switzerland for your precious metals. Our highly trained and experienced advisors strive to help you in customizing solid strategies of wealth preservation for your financial and retirement assets.

McAlvany Financial Group

The McAlvany Financial Group has a contrarian, in-depth approach to its analysis, allowing the company to avoid decisions based on emotion, and thus combine maximum risk mitigation with consistent real growth for its clients’ investments. Integrity, attentiveness, and longevity have characterized the company’s client relationships since 1972.